Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@latex-project.org> writes:

> for the sake of an argument, what about 
> 
>  1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message
>     that it isn't the original package
>  
>  2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be
>     used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages
>     without making any other processing changes, you must use that.
> 
> i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your
> concern?

I'd prefer just saying that the documentation must make clear what the
provenance is.