Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)

[Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@latex-project.org>]

Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes:
 > Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> writes:
 > 
 > >   1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message
 > >      that it isn't Standard LaTeX.
 > > 
 > >   2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be
 > >      used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages
 > >      to the screen, you must use that.
 > 
 > The problem is what to do if number (2) applies, and that the
 > "documented standard way" happens to fold a message-to-the-user
 > together with a programmatic thing.

for the sake of an argument, what about 

 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message
    that it isn't the original package
 
 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be
    used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages
    without making any other processing changes, you must use that.

i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your
concern?

frank