Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:28:30AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 12:35, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Strictly speaking, our concerns are only whether a license is
> > legimitate, and whether it's DFSG-free.
>
> Well, when we see stuff like the cdrdao license, which appears to create
> a dual-licensed mess along the lines of my hypothetical, I'd have
> concerns about that license being legitimate.
>
> Since it really doesn't make any sense what so ever, I don't think the
> author intended to actually apply the GPL.
It is perfectly reasonable for us to err on the side of caution and
elect not to distribute a work when the copyright license on it is
self-contradictory and confusing. Indeed, to avoid distributing it is
the best defense against an allegation of copyright infringement.
--
G. Branden Robinson | I am sorry, but what you have
Debian GNU/Linux | mistaken for malicious intent is
branden@debian.org | nothing more than sheer
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | incompetence! -- J. L. Rizzo II
Attachment:
pgpnuzew4V1dM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Glenn Maynard <g_deb@zewt.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>