On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > > First of all, requiring a source file rename is, I think, obviously OK;
> > > renaming "foo.c" to "bar.c" doesn't really affect your rights, and is
> > > mostly an annoyance (tracking down Makefile references and so on).
> >
> > Why is this obviously OK? DFSG #4 allows people to mandate the change
> > of the name of the work. Requiring name changes of files is too
> > granular.
>
> It's not expressly forbidden or expressly allowed, so we have to figure
> out if it's OK or not. As I mentioned, it doesn't seem onerous as a
> requirement; just an mv/cp and a few Makefile edits.
Would you not need to rename the Makefile too if you edit it?
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgphlqtImcueX.pgp
Description: PGP signature