Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:01:14AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Scripsit Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
> > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >
> > > > I don't need to defend whatever past decisions may have been made;
> > > > they quite possibly were simply incorrect.
> >
> > > Unless, of course, they involved the GNU Emacs Manual, right? :-P
> >
> > Please keep that flamewar in its appointed thread...
>
> Mail-Copies-To: nobody
> X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
>
> Please respect my damn mail headers.
And "damn headers" they are. This business of hiding little requests
in mail headers is getting damn annoying. People should be a whole
lot more tolerant about it, and damn-it-all get software which does
what they want instead of using non-standard extensions and then
lambasting everyone who doesn't support the non-standard.
Thomas
Reply to: