Re: GDB manual
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 11:49:47PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I asked RMS about the GDB manual. It has two invariant sections, one
> of which is a "where to obtain GDB" section; the other is an
> introductory tutorial to using GDB. I asked RMS why the latter of
> these needed to be invariant. He replied that it shouldn't be
> invariant and he'll ask the relevant maintainer to fix it.
>
> As for the former, I'm sure he intends that to remain invariant; it's
> not an accident. Still, the most egregious invariant section I know
> of has been fixed. :)
What about "Stabs Types" and "Stabs Sections"? (Also GDB.) I can only
wonder why whoever did this wanted any of these invariant. (Actually,
it might be useful to know--the first major misuses of GFDL invariant
sections. Probably just not reading the license well, though ...)
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to:
- References:
- GDB manual
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)