On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:27:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I'm still not clear on whether the GNU Manifesto [0] has a place in > main, and, if it does, what that place should be. I'm not sure where the > line should be drawn, except that licenses should be okay, and that it > shouldn't be allowed for important technical things. > > Cheers, > aj > > [0] And the Debian Official Logo, the social contract, the Debian > manifesto, and a bunch of other things that don't have clearly > free licenses, but also don't *really* need them. Well, I don't personally feel that Debian's Manifesto has any more business in main than GNU's, if neither document is modifiable. -- G. Branden Robinson | "To be is to do" -- Plato Debian GNU/Linux | "To do is to be" -- Aristotle branden@debian.org | "Do be do be do" -- Sinatra http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpdh9cM2FZej.pgp
Description: PGP signature