debian-legal Jan 2000 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[f.kunkel@ecomp.net: LOGO]
Alternative trigger condition.
Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed.
BSD-like freedom (was Re: KDE not in Debian?)
Bug#56166: base-files: copyright in motd is outdated (fwd)
Difference between code and content
Re: Double Standard?
DVD CCA - more bad news (fwd)
Free World Licence possible improved structure.
Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being
Re: FreeVeracity shipment.
Re: From Corel on the EULA
Re: FunnelWeb manuals copyright issues
IBM EWS license
Re: ibm jdk licence
Is this license DFSG compliant?
Is this Public Domain? And is it DFSG-free?
Is this really patent-free LZW?
kde and debian a long love story :)
Re: KDE not in Debian?
License - is this acceptable?
License of Kermit
Majordomo problems
Re: need sponsorship for sphinx
New OPL Draft
new US crypto regulations allow source code export?
Not for commercial use - non-free?
the perennial pine licensing problem
Re: PINE Clone
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for January 7, 2000
Re: RHTVision and SETEdit, non-free? are they distributable at all? Anything that can be done about?
RHTVision and SETEdit, non-free? are they distributable at all? Anything that can be done about?
Some reading
trn license
Updating the OpenContent license
Re: Uploaded mirror 2.9-13slink15 (source all) to master
URGENT: Free World Licence "final" attempt.
Re: vis5d license
Was Re: KDE not in Debian?
The last update was on 09:23 GMT Sat May 11. There are 204 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc