Op di 14-10-2003, om 07:17 schreef Branden Robinson: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:34:24AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > You missed the one big one, too: the apparent requirement to preferentially > > licence modifications you make to the copyright holders of the original SE > > copyright holders. Don't worry, I missed it too at first. <grin> > > Well, it turns out to be irrelevant as the upstream copyright holders > seem disinclined to do anything at all about the licensing at present. "If you can help us with setting up a license which fulfils our intention and at the same time has no unclear points, you are welcome to provide suggestions." Not that I think I'm experienced enough to provide suggestions, but can't we at least try? -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org If you're running Microsoft Windows, either scan your computer on viruses, or stop wasting my bandwith and remove me from your addressbook. *now*.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend