Le dim 25/05/2003 à 01:19, Richard Stallman a écrit : > That doesn't make the issue go away. > > It addresses the issue that was raised here before. > Someone said that the GDB manual had marked a section invariant > which was not secondary. I must have missed that one. Still, there are invariant sections in that manual, which make its re-use almost impossible. Especially, incompatibility with GPL is obnoxious, practically speaking. > An invariant section is invariant, > and it is not free (even according to your own definition), > > With all due respect, this is not for you to say. You are entitled to > your opinion, and Debian is entitled to choose its own standards, but > you do not interpret the GNU Project's standards any more than I > interpret Debian's standards. Then, I would like you to explain why you think a document with invariant sections is free for the GNU definition of freedom, instead of repeating around and around you are not convinced by our arguments. Maybe this would make a basis for more constructive discussion. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature