Am Dienstag 16 Juni 2015, 09:05:31 schrieb Christian Hilberg: > Hi everyone, > > wheezy-backports has 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1~bpo70+1 built, while the > source info already refers to linux_3.16.7-ckt11.orig.tar.xz (see [0]). > > Since ckt11 has CVE-2015-3636 fixed and ckt9 has not (see [1]), I was > wondering whether or not there is some issue with building ckt11 for > wheezy-backports. Ooops, oversight on my part, ckt11 has already been accepted into wheezy-backports (see [2]). Sorry for the noise. > If there is no such issue, I would be very happy to see ckt11 get into > wheezy-backports, since apart from the security issue mentioned above, > ckt11 also has the proper backlisting for the queued TRIM command > in the broken Samsung 850 Pro SSD firmware. > > Kind regards, > > Christian > > [0] https://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 > [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3636 Best, Christian [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2015/06/msg00095.html -- kernel concepts GmbH Tel: +49-271-771091-11 Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 D-57072 Siegen http://www.kernelconcepts.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.