Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
* Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) [040524 18:10]:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) [040524 16:10]:
> > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:46AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > > > Given that everyone extremly dislikes the single source package scheme
> >
> > > > Well, if you're taking a poll, count me in favor of single source
> > > > package.
> >
> > > Single source packages are nice, but not practical in the debian case. I
> > > guess you will have uploads multiplied by 12 or so compared to today, if
> > > you want to keep the reactivity that is possible today.
> >
> > Well, even if it is not possible to do a single source package, we
> > should IMHO really be able to reduce the number of source packages in
> > sarge to 0-1 for 2.2, 2 for 2.4 and 2 for 2.6. Of course, this means
> > major work after we decided which kernel version should be released
> > with, but I really think it's worth, because it makes it much easier
> > for the security team.
> Yes, i agree with you, but this is fully orthogonal to what is currently
> discussed here, at least this is how i understand this.
Then I either didn't understand the discussion, or wrote my proposal
in a wrong way.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: