[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE SC 4.5.1 packages available



On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM, George Kiagiadakis
<kiagiadakis.george@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On penktadienis 10 Rugsėjis 2010 19:47:25 George Kiagiadakis wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Zsolt Rizsanyi
>>>
>>> <rizsanyi@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
>> wrote:
>>> >> Digikam again with glib dbg package installed. This crash might be
>>> >> related to the marble crash as well. At least that marble widget
>>> >> appears in this
>>> >
>>> >> backtrace, too:
>>> > Hmm, I have found a cure. Checking digikam I have seen, that digikam
>>> > depends on libmarblewidget4 (which is kde 4.4.5) and marble depends on
>>> > libmarblewidget10 (which is kde 4.5.1).
>>> > After removing libmarblewidget4 (including digikam) now marble does not
>>> > crash.
>>>
>>> Thanks, that must be the problem. I will investigate it.
>>> libmarblewidget4 should not be installed on the system, it is replaced
>>> by libmarblewidget10 now. Obviously digikam needs a rebuild and
>>> probably something needs to conflict with libmarblewidget4, but not
>>> sure what yet.
>>
>> There is no good solution for such a case except binNMU. The recent failed
>> libjpeg transition was another example of how messy such things could get.
>> Unfortunately, Breaks would complicate migration to testing unnecessarily.
>>
>
> Right, so in the digikam case, digikam links to libmarblewidget4 and
> loads plugins which link to libmarblewidget10. In this case it is
> reasonable to crash and I agree that the correct solution is a binNMU.
> But what happens in the case of marble itself? It links against
> libmarblewidget10 and the plugins as well, but when libmarblewidget4
> is installed, it crashes and there is nothing mentioning
> libmarblewidget4 in the backtrace. That doesn't make much sense to me.
> Ideas?
>

fwiw, I cannot reproduce the marble crash with libmarblewidget4 installed.


Reply to: