Re: digikam broken in unstable?
Achim Schaefer:
> > it seems that something is severely broken with digikam in unstable
> > atm (at least on my box ;-).
>
> I' using as well mainly unstable, but e.g. qt 4.6 from experimental.
> BTW I'm using the i386 architectur.
And digikam goes up to 95%+ for at least 30min? (I stoped it after 30
min...)
>
> > Digikam eats up 95%+ of the cpu and does not terminate properly.
> > (bug ##560893) Upstreams says, this might be a Debian problem.
> >
> > Therefore, can anyone confirm the behaviour?
>
> Sorry, but the behaviour is as normal as it should be.
Can you perhaps elaborate a little bit on your theory that any kind of
software might eat 95%+ cpu while idle without being considered as severely
broken?!
(sorry for my poor English)
Reply to: