[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libqt3-emb



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003 02:30, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:05:45PM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 28. Januar 2003 16:35, Regnat Nikolaus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm using Ralfs KDE 3.1 debs for woody (thanks for the great work!) and
> > > wondered where the libqt3-emb packages are. Obviously they where not
> > > backported from sid. Do I have to compile them for myself or will
> > > someone (Ralf?) provide them (later)?
> > >
> > > If I have to compile them myself, are there any tips and tricks to get
> > > them compiled on a woody system?
> > >
> > > Nik
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, but my first post got in the wrong place....
> >
> > The procedure should be as follows:
> >
> > I've been working with the current qt-x11-free maintainer to get the Qt
> > packages in a new shape and fix (most) bugs with the packaging so that
> > they make most sense. The next step is to talk to Ivan and fix up the
> > packaging of the qt-embedded package.
> >
> > FYI, the qt-embedded packaging only makes real sense in an embedded
> > development environment (with Qtopia for instance and crosscompiliers for
> > arm and xscale preferably), and then only in version 2.3.2 which is used
> > on current devices avalable on the market. Qt-3.1.1 for embedded is
> > currently just there but it only makes sense to use it for certain,
> > limited projects where size doesn't matter and where the end device is an
> > ix86 processor (well, otherwise take the ones for other platforms but
> > then size restrictions will catch you soon).
>
> I'm actually doing alot of work on the Embedded packages currently.  I'm
> working on Qtopia as well and will be working more with the Debian Zaurus
> project.
What I meant is syncing efforts with the qt-x11-free packages so that things 
don't show up double like the makeqpf and qvfb programs that we now package 
inside qt-x11 which will make any dependency on your side to a build against 
a qt-x11 obsolete; further where things should go and into which packages. 
It's not so much an issue with qt-embedded 2.3.2 as it is with 3.x ones I 
think, but generally tools like qvfb that are used by the developer on the 
desktop (so depend on the x11 version) should ship with qt-x11.

Let's clear out details later when Martin has uploaded the new qt-x11 
packages. We'll do a diff from qt-copy now against the original qt-x11-free 
package from Trolltech to make clear it's a set of accepted packages but 
everything shows up in the diff that includes the debian dir as patches 
what's in qt-copy. Another thing is two manpages missing that we'll have to 
write.

Ralf
>
>
> Ivan
>
> --
> ----------------
> Ivan E. Moore II
> rkrusty@tdyc.com
> http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
> GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
> GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD

- -- 
We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralf Nolden
nolden@kde.org

The K Desktop Environment       The KDevelop Project
http://www.kde.org              http://www.kdevelop.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+N4I7u0nKi+w1Ky8RAvCAAJ9iNJypbVjxMzaNrjLNJTxjnBd3iwCgqhSX
9yhsTZjHDoLX0ub1djcT8i8=
=U0QQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: