Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages
On 13/04/2013 12:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 12.04.2013 13:41, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages
>> are now a bit useless.
>
> no. why should they be useless?
As I said, it was my perception. Looks like I was wrong for some of
them. Sorry Matthias ;)
> > 2) Fill bugs on the following packages to ask their removals.
>
> no. at least all of these needed to build stuff should stay.
> including ecj and ant.
OK. So, a step would be to figure out which one are necessary to
bootstrap and the facultative one. Am I right ?
> Maybe to clear your perception, please start getting OpenJDK
> supported on more platforms. E.g. mips, kfreebsd, and the Hurd.
I was not talking about the removing the gcj compiler.
Sylvestre
Reply to: