Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:
> file. Changelog entries should be focused on the change, not the bug, and
> should be descriptive enough to allow someone who was not involved with the
> bug report (e.g., most users of the package) to understand what changed.
Is there any reason to include text saying "more info in BTS"? IMO
there is a reason to refer to external sources (like Kaffe lists etc.)
but isn't it obvious that BTS contains more information if a changelog
entry closes a BTS bug?
Just a cosmetic nitpick, thanks for the latest Kaffe!
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
Reply to: