Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net> writes: > I want us in testing for two reasons: > > 1) Visibility > 2) So we have a noose around various maintainers necks if they break > their packages. > > But we need to be compiling 90%+ of the packages succesfully to do > this. Without pthreads, and without some arch: proposal to add > linux-all, linux-any, we've got a ways to go. We could use testing anyway, but without participating in the architecture set over which a package has to be in sync. It's also no showstopper when a package is not-yet-compiled on m68k, because that autobuilder is slow. OTOH, that would pretty much kill your two reasons. OTTH, we'd still get the benefit of a bit more leeway to discover problems. Had I filed a grave bug on e2fsprogs in time, the version in testing would still be as before. Right now we only have the semi-broken version from unstable. (I hope this paragraph makes some sense, it's getting late.) -- Robbe
Attachment:
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature