Re: New CD set (was: Exim)
On 19 Jun 2001, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz> writes:
>
> > exim, ae are OK then. I will wait for gcc-3.0
>
> It would be good to avoid e2fsprogs 1.20-2 which is currently in the
> archive. With it you have to answer yes for every disk when booting.
>
> We're still waiting on the resolve of a small compile problem. The
> maintainers are generally quite quick, but I can also upload a patched
> version if needs be.
>
> FWIW, if hurd-i386 were included in the "testing" mechanism, could you
> easily produce CDs from testing? This would prevent problems like
> e2fsprog's.
The images are produced from a separate Hurd sub-archive and manual
intervention is possible after this has be created.
This means that a more functional e2fsprogs could be substituted at this
stage. Which should I use?
It would be relatively easy to move the generation of the sub-archive from
unstable to testing. However, would new Hurd packages make it into
testing as quickly as unstable?
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Dunedin, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
philipc@copyleft.co.nz - preferred. philipc@debian.org
Reply to: