Re: ldconfig
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:11:08PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > That's an idea. Can you submit it as a bug report against libc0.2 (or
> > whatever contains ldconfig now)?
>
> I've expanded the script a bit, so that "ldconfig -X" and the like
> still silently succeeds, and put in a --help message discussing the
> issues. Could you review it (in bug#95189), particularly the
> explanation? I don't want to spread pseudoauthorative falsehoods.
It might be worth to elide the use of getopt.
The getopt binary is in util-linux. This is only on alpha.gnu.org
and not really ported and it is also not in the tar file.
On the other hand, it might be worth to push porting util-linux, but it
needs heavy changes to the Makefiles. It would be wise to coordinate this
with the upstream maintainer. (Ideally, util-linux would cease to exist and
all utilities spread among other GNU packages like textutils. Roland sent me
a list for such a division. I can provide it to interested people).
Otherwise, I like it very much. The text is fine.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
Reply to: