Cord Beermann <debian@cord.de> writes: > jove's last Upstream-version is dated 1994 or 95. > > the Maintainer (Loic Prylli) hasn't moved sind 1998. (see also mailx) > > the Package isn't orphaned or something, else i would apply > as New Maintainer to take it over, as i like that editor very > much. Perhaps you should apply anyway - you should be able to do NMUs at least if the Maintainer is inresponsive. Plus you could do porter-NMUs for the Hurd. > Ob-Hurd: it would be nice if your list could be enhanced, so that > the reports about compiling (or not) with the changes could be > documented. (this also avoids double work.) Yeah, additional information (version x compiles cleanly; patch from bug #32345 needed; not useful for Hurd; etc.) would be fine. ATM, your best bet is to check out the bugs of a package. Porting changes should end up in the BTS, ideally under a heading that contains "Hurd" somewhere... -- Robbe
Attachment:
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature