Bug#1041273: ITP: rust-rustls-webpki -- web PKI X.509 certificate verification
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
* Package name : rust-rustls-webpki
Version : 0.101.1
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/rustls/webpki/issues
* URL : https://github.com/rustls/webpki
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : web PKI X.509 certificate verification
rustls-webpki is a library
that validates Web PKI (TLS/SSL) certificates.
It's used by Rustls to handle certificate-related tasks
required for implementing TLS clients and servers.
.
rustls-webpki is written in Rust
and uses ring for cryptographic operations and low-level parsing.
.
This is a fork of the webpki project
which adds a number of features required by the rustls project.
.
Rustls is a modern TLS library written in Rust.
.
This package contains the source for the Rust rustls-webpki crate,
for use with cargo and dh-cargo.
This package is needed for newer releases of package rust-rustls.
It will be maintained in the collaborative debian section of salsa, at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rust-rustls-webpki
- Jonas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Bfnz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: