Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.07.2013, 14:45 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:35:46PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > - Using the full source tarball. Saddly this means having to compile most of
> > it in order to get the tools for building the doc, or hacking far too much the
> > build system to do something else.
> >
> > - Build each submodule's doc.
> >
> - Option 3:
>
> For packages 1 and 2 build without docs but also build a
> package{1,2}-src package.
Option 4:
Have two source packages, package1 and package1-for-docs. They’d have
exactly the same upstream tarball, but of course different debian/-dirs:
* The first builds the binaries and no docs.
* The second source package builds only the docs.
The gain is that the second source package can build-depend on package2
without introducing build dependency cycles. I’d say it justifies the
slight unprettiness of having the same tarball twice in the archive.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part