Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:28:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 51E7DF56.6050902@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 51E7CD8A.5020400@physik.fu-berlin.de>
References: <[🔎] x6ip0eqgkb.fsf@midna.lan> <[🔎] 51E22CE3.6060709@debian.org> <[🔎] 51E267F3.8060004@physik.fu-berlin.de> <[🔎] CAAZ6_fD_jO6u4hZXhvE=wVR9rPOEGVOy9Q0Ekzfx3C=4adTp2w@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87bo6545ka.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] CAAZ6_fCuLWPRr2+m+tZ=6xW+V3EE-Ji-qb=6MxkHSObtNtfYPw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20130714192015.GB17169@bongo.bofh.it> <[🔎] 51E3B049.4020103@debian.org> <[🔎] 20130715181915.GG26316@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] 51E49F46.1090906@debian.org> <[🔎] 20130717172955.GA7976@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] 51E79600.1060607@debian.org> <[🔎] 51E7CD8A.5020400@physik.fu-berlin.de>

On 18/07/13 12:12, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> And systemd has a graphical user interface?

Yes, systemadm(1) in systemd-ui. It was recently split into a separate
(upstream and Debian source) package. It's hardly comprehensive, but it
exists.

    S

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>

References:
- Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: David Kalnischkies <kalnischkies@gmail.com>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: David Kalnischkies <kalnischkies@gmail.com>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
Next by Date: Re: On accepting pre-generated doc from upstream
Previous by thread: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
Next by thread: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread