Hi Andrew On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 03:53:21PM -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun Jan 29, 2012 at 20:40:57 +0100, Poison Bit wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org> wrote: > >> Second, a suggestion or some brain dump about ideas on howto improve > >> the issues communication: > >> > >> I imagine the scenario, where some DD is trying to work from any > >> place in the world. Nowadays, there are many points to check if a > >> service is not working... is it my last upgrade? is it my last config > >> change? is it my ISP? is it some intermediate ISP? is it the service > >> that is really down? of course, this kind of email notifications are > >> just fine to notify a known issue. > >> > >> So I ask myself... the reason to do not run "any" public monitoring > >> system, is much increase in the workload of the sysadmins ? There are > >> different approaches to do it... > > > > There is a monitoring, but it seems most DDs and non-DDs do not care and > > start to pester the admins directly [1]. > > > > URL and access to the monitoring is documented publicly. > > Do you mean: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi > > If so, it's not reporting vasks as down, but that still seems to be > the case. If you're referring to something else, I'd love to know > about it. Martin Zobel-Helas is probably refering to the DSA Wiki [1]. [1] http://dsa.debian.org/ Hope that helps, Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature