Hi, just a minor note: Am Samstag, den 13.08.2011, 13:28 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth: > To mark such packages and to be able to decide when to re-schedule the > build, all binary-packages get the additional header > Build-Depends: minmal package_version .... > injected, so that one could see later on that this was a partial build > and reschedule a new build when newly upcoming packages allow more > binary packages to be built, or all build-dependencies are available > and we could do a clean full build. This seems to be an unfortunate choice of a field name, as it has different semantics than other Build-Depends fields. Why not "Built-With:"? Also, this might be useful independently from your feature, and in all package, and is similar to what dh-buildinfo provides. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part