Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 13:26 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > On jeu., 2010-02-04 at 17:21 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On 03/02/2010 07:14, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > I'd go for the -browserplugin suffix. > > > > > > Speaking of plugins, I see there are several plugin packages that put > > > plugins in various places. Here is a breaking news: the canonical place > > > for plugins is /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins. Nowhere else. > > > > > > Why ? Because it's where most of the plugins already are (but some > > > packages like to put their files in several places, which is pointless), > > > and it's where all applications are already looking for plugins. > > > > > I started packaging parole media player which provides a plugin using > > npapi, and recently submitted a bug to split rhythmbox package. In both > > case I used the scheme: > > > > browser-plugin-* > > > > (replacing mozilla by browser, in fact). None of the packages are > > already uploaded so I can still change. > > I'm about to upload parole, so I'd like to know what's the status on > this? At the moment a search on -browserplugin doesn't return anything. > A search on browser-plugin returns cairo-dock-quick-browser-plugin and > that's all. It seems that no package was really renamed. > > What should we do? I think we should start using the new naming policy to add the -browserplugin suffix. There were some votes for -browserplugin and none against it. No better name was proposed. Therefore I think that it was decided. -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil