>> It would have been MORE than easy to have bz2 support in 1.0. There is >> absolutely no reason why it needs a 3.0 just for a different compression. >> But that wasnt wanted. > By whom? dpkg maintainers, archive admins, package maintainers? > tar.bz2 support is the only reason I see for considering 3.0 at this > point… Archive side its about a tiny regex. -- bye, Joerg <HE> Joerg knuddeln ist wie mit Skorpionen schlafen.