On May 31, John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org> wrote: > Please don't call it DRM. It's just advisory locking. IMHO not enabling > it or omitting it entirely has no legal implications. It clearly has no legal implication (in jurisdictions having such a clause, like the USA) because it is not an *effective* technological protection measure. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature