On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:54:29PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I see no reason to deviate from upstream's choices here, no matter
> how trivial the patches are.
<snip>
> There is a design decision you don't like, well.
Thanks for the clarity. As hinted in my previous post, I consider
that you (KDE maintainer in general) are totally empowered to take it
[1].
Still, I've an unanswered curiosity which might help in the
debate. Beside the per-user setting, is there any system-wide setting
that the local sysadm can trigger to have DRM-free okular by default
for all its users?
While I see as reasonable that you took this choice, I see similarly
reasonable that you give the choice to sysadms to make a different
choice easily. If this thread has shown something, is that the choice
is a debatable one, hence it is very likely that sysadms out there
will have such a desire.
Many thanks in advance,
Cheers.
[1] as well as John, or anybody else, is entitled to escalate the
issue to the CTTE, now that is clear that on your side the issue
is closed
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature