On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:35:56 +0100 Dominique Dumont <dominique.dumont@hp.com> wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes: > > But then we are back at the issue of a 80-20 problem, and I see the > > VCS solution as more flexible and more readily available. > > Agreed. But VCS solution is a 80% success/20% silent > failure. Config::Model is a 80% success/20% abort. The latter should > be easier to deal with for average user. But you don't need to silently merge (and thus silently fail in some cases). You can still ask the user about confirmation. harry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature