[WARNING: THIS MESSAGE IS PGP/MIME SIGNED, DON'T BLAME MY MUA ;)] The only thing I remember is an ancient (2006) discussion on heise online (and probably elsewhere too) [0] (German only, sorry) about this topic and all this has been brought forward and not backed up by any proofs. Back then the last reply was not to reply... could we please skip to that part. It's just not worth the effort. @all the DDs/DMs and all other contributors: please don't feed the troll. ;) Thanks, Kai [0] http://www.heise.de/open/news/foren/forum-104357/msg-11172557/read/ Joerg Schilling schrieb: >> xcdroast is looking for cdrecord, which does no longer exist in Debian >> Sid (apparently). And wodim does no longer provide a symlink as cdrecord >> or something (apparently). > >> So: xcdroast does no longer work. Who is to blame (Bug entry): xcdroats >> or wodim? > > You need to blame the people who are responsible for removing cdrecord > and who started to include a fork (wodim) that cannot be legally distributed. > > Just add cdrecord from: > > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ > > and you get a legal and working system. > > Jörg -- Kai Wasserbäch (Kai Wasserbaech) E-Mail: debian@carbon-project.org Jabber (debianforum.de): Drizzt URL: http://wiki.debianforum.de/Drizzt_Do%27Urden GnuPG: 0xE1DE59D2 0600 96CE F3C8 E733 E5B6 1587 A309 D76C E1DE 59D2 (http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/pks/lookup?search=0xE1DE59D2&fingerprint=on&hash=on&op=vindex)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature