On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 14:11 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > > > > Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine > > which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's > > kernel. I would like to do that in a different way. > > > > If we will not see dom0 in linux-2.6 on Debian, we should at least have > > a 2.6.18 tree with dom0. > > no. > we will not have 2 different linux-2.6 versions in Lenny. > please think of the implications before throwing out suggestions. > What about the implications of introducing feature regressions? The patches to enable dom0 without pv-ops are available, yet they are unwanted. Wouldn't it be possible to build with both pv-ops and non-pv-ops for dom0? At any rate, please make it well documented where waldi's kernels are if you intend to not have dom0 in 2.6.26. William
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part