Re: lilypond and python
Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr> writes:
> This is the stupidiest thing you ever did, because everyone had to look
> at your handling of your packages. Everybody saw your gcc-4.1 RC with
> a patch which you're blocking until the new upstream release.
> Everybody saw the awful packaging mistakes you did. You can close or
> downgrade the bugs I reported, it's too late.
Actually, I didn't make those "packaging mistakes"; the previous
maintainer did. But I'm not somehow trying to keep secrets or claim
some moral high ground.
You seem to think this is a battle, in which there is a winner and a
loser. I don't.
> I heard from multiple sources that the problem with the new upstream
> release was not at all caused by the default python version -- as you
> claimed -- but either by a higher guile requirement.
No, it requires *both* the newer Python *and* the newer Guile. You
are not paying attention. You are instead trying to get by with
minimal understanding, proclaiming how deficient I am, reporting so
far *three* bugs, one of which is not a bug, and the other two of
which are *clearly* wishlist items; indeed, in one of the reports
*you yourself* indicate that it's a wishlist item. Grow up.
Reply to: