Re: lilypond and python
Aurélien GÉRÔME <ag@roxor.cx> writes:
> This is utterly unacceptable. What do you do of the
> reverse-dependencies? If you are not capable of dealing with a package
> that you are supposed to maintain, you should O: it or RFA: it, instead
> of cornering users. That is irresponsible as a Debian Developer, low,
> and lame. I am very disappointed. :(
Of course it's a miserable course of events if it happens. But are
you seriously saying that you think lilypond 2.6.3 is suitable for the
release, even with the existing RC bugs fixed? I thought you were in
agreement that releasing 2.6.3 was not acceptible.
Thomas
Reply to: