Re: greylisting on debian.org?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: greylisting on debian.org?
From: claus@xn--frber-gra.muc.de (Claus Färber)
Date: 20 Jul 2006 21:27:00 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 9yEwLwV3cDD@gmane.3247.org>
References: <[🔎] 44ABBC63.70709@lonien.de> <[🔎] 20060716063630.GL13591@djedefre.onera> <[🔎] u1hu05fncsz.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060717214222.GA7670@www.lobefin.net> <[🔎] u1h8xmqemxm.fsf@kempis.becket.net>

Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> schrieb/wrote:
> So the meaning of 4xx is "temporary local problem".

RFC 2822 says "4yz Transient Negative Completion reply" (p. 42). The
standard also encourages the re-use of existing error codes for
"slightly different situations" (p. 43).

Claus

Reply to:

References:
- greylisting on debian.org?
  - From: Wolfgang Lonien <wolfgang@lonien.de>
- Re: greylisting on debian.org?
  - From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
- Re: greylisting on debian.org?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: greylisting on debian.org?
  - From: Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>
- Re: greylisting on debian.org?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (Not so fresh) News about locales
Next by Date: Re: Measuring "should I greylist?" false positive rate [was: greylisting on debian.org?]
Previous by thread: Re: greylisting on debian.org?
Next by thread: Greylisting: discussion should stop here, for now (Re: greylisting on debian.org?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread