Benjamin Seidenberg wrote: > I wonder if it would be possible to appeal to google to have them > manually edit that search so that l.d.o doesn't appear. (Same for > [replaced with "string instrument" to avoid another google hit]'s) What I think I would rather see is targeted moderation of anything that matched either of those two things. That would keep them out of the mailing lists and _eventually_ one would think the page rank would decrease to the old archives. Of course that would take someone to do the work of moderating that particular pattern match. And at least someone will contrive an example that matches but is otherwise valid and complain about it. Perhaps we should call upon everyone who reads Debian lists to, as their sacred duty, blog somewhere at least three hits to the upstream sites as a way to artifically promote them higher? :-/ (sarcasm) Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature