Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
Matthew Palmer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 07:01:37PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> On Saturday 20 August 2005 02:20 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> > How does their extensive use of it explain why they would reimplement
>> > it?
>> Is there anyone who's used CVS extensively and HASN'T thought about
>> reimplementing it?
> Judging by the number of revision control systems springing up out there,
> I'd say the answer to that question is "No, and furthermore most of them
> have gone further than just thinking about it".
Huh? None of those reimplement cvs, they produce replacements. arch
and svn and bitkeeper are *not* reimplementations of cvs.