On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 07:01:37PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Saturday 20 August 2005 02:20 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > How does their extensive use of it explain why they would reimplement > > it? > > Is there anyone who's used CVS extensively and HASN'T thought about > reimplementing it? Judging by the number of revision control systems springing up out there, I'd say the answer to that question is "No, and furthermore most of them have gone further than just thinking about it". OpenCVS is one of the few to not think "and I can make it Suck Less, to boot". - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature