On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:26:59PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:17 +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > > El Viernes 27 Mayo 2005 14:09, Pierre Habouzit escribió: > > > multimedia seems more appropriate. most of the video player actually are > > > music player too, and some music player can show video with appropriate > > > plugins (xmms e.g.) > > > > > > though, that would mean that 'sound' won't have that many package. so > > > maybe we should rename sound into multimedia and populate it with video > > > players too ? > > > > I support renaming sound into multimedia and include video and sound stuff > > there... > > What about players that only play sound? Like mpg321 and friends? > That's hardly multimedia... Not every package in gnome is actually GNOME. They are components that are useful in a GNOME environment. Likewise, every package in a multimedia section does not specifically need to provide all multimedia functions itself. It simply has to be useful in a multimedia environment. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
Attachment:
pgpNnC76ta8da.pgp
Description: PGP signature