* David Schmitt (david@schmitt.edv-bus.at) wrote: > Another factor might be security support: > > At least one buildd (plus hot-standby) must be available [under strict > DSA/Security administration] which is fast enough to build security updates > without infringing on vendor-sec embargoes. I'm not 100% sure that's quite right... As I understand it, the people maintaining buildds need to be trusted and perhaps to sign an NDA or something saying they won't go blab to the world about a package going through their testing queue. I don't believe that's quite the same as requiring that the buildd be under DSA, unless DSA is expanded to include what I describe above... Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature