Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Well, "dropping" a previously unreleased arch is something different than > really dropping a multiple released arch. I think "not releasing yet" would > be the appropriate term for s390 at least. s390 was released with woody. > When you only refer to d-i as being release relevant, then I don't know why > all those people complain about packages not entering testing? d-i is the area with the most likelyhood to need to drop unworking arches. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature