Re: testing and no release schedule
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:10:29PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > It's exactly the desktop software that often has very long
> > > dependency chains that are difficult to get into a releasable state
> > > at the same time.
> > ...yet all of the other Linux distributors seem to be able to do it.
> ... by having goals nowhere near as lofty.
> Debian releases on what is it, 11 archs? Most of them are never tested
> by upstream authors, so if there's a problem, guess where it's going to
> show up?
How about we just stop making excuses? If dead architectures are holding up
the release process, then drop them, or make them secondary platforms. m68k
wouldn't be any worse off today if we had released an i386 sarge six months
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>