On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:00:05PM +0100, cobaco wrote: > -> if you don't allow temporary solutions while low priority debconf > question get included, than there currently are no CDD's as > custom configuration is necessary to support a CDD's target group > out-of-the-box. This isn't totally true. Some CDDs are happy just working on a group of packages that weren't around before and allowing for a task, metapackage, or something similar. Low priority debconf questions are way of solving a "we want something other than the default *configuration* for a given set of packages" problem. This seems like a thing that many, but not necessary all, CDDs will want to do. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako@debian.org http://mako.yukidoke.org/
Attachment:
pgpfNUQilTQxu.pgp
Description: PGP signature