On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:26:39PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:42:09AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote: [snip] > > No, upstream bugs are bugs in Debian too. There's no reason to "hide" > > them. > > I know this is different from the given situation, but the question is > just as valid... > > Is it OK to ask submitters to file wishlist bugs for new features with > upstream? As maintainer of spamassassin, I have generally closed bugs > for new rule requests (asking users to submit upstream), simply > because the number of new rule requests could get to be quite massive; > these requests clutter the BTS, and generally aren't worth the effort > to forward to upstream bugzilla. (If someone created a nice script to [snip] FWIW, I usually file SA rule requests upstream since it eliminates the overhead of the DD passing it on, which reduces the delay. Other bugs I file on BTS since it may or may not be a Debian-specific bug. T -- "I'm running Windows '98." "Yes." "My computer isn't working now." "Yes, you already said that." -- User-Friendly
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature