Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>And nothing stated here invalidates my statements in any way. If
>sponsorship isn't viewed as any kind of a hinderance for normal
>applicants then there is no need for accelerated or special treatment
>for those working on select packages.
Work requiring CVS access is made more awkward without developer status,
as is work requiring access to the random architecture boxes.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.devel@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>
- Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
- From: "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net>