[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: default MTA for sarge



On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:38:11 +1000
Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> wrote:
> i've noticed over the years that people who aren't able to make a valid
> point, who have no facts or experience behind them will quickly descend to
> personal attacks.
 
> try sticking to arguing the issues.  you might retain (or even gain) some
> credibility that way.

    Which describes what you've done in this thread just as you did years ago.

> well, duh.  headers come in arbitrary order.

    It isn't that hard to read the headers into a hash and then check the
header filters in order so they actually have some value.  I mean pretty much
every /other/ program that can process mail does.

> i don't claim that.  i claim to have enough experience with many different
> MTAs over the years that a) i am qualified to make a comparison and b) that
> my opinion has some non-trivial worth.

    Except your comparison has no bearing on anyone else.  Anyone who has
looked at both or tried both can also express an opinion of equal worth. 
Neither opinion means anyone ELSE is going to find either configuration easier
or harder.

    Given this message, your past history on this list and the fine examples
that you've not mended your ways in this thread (notice that many people have
refuted nearly every one of your claims repeatedly yet you ignore and insult
them) I'm going to take the sane way out and just ignore you from here on out
as you obviously have no worth to any intelligent discussion.


-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
       PGP Key: 8B6E99C5       | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
	                       |    -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpj2YY5PR7zX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: