On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:33:29PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > I don't; it's silly. At best you'll get an architecture tag for the > arch that the buildd maintainer reported the bug on, but that's it. > An inaccurate architecture tag is worse than useless, it's misleading. > Just parse wanna-build's failed logs; it's trivial. Something that would be really useful would be to open up the ability to annotate the buildd logs more widely. I've often felt that the buildd logs would be a lot more useful if they linked into the BTS more often. Other things would be handy but the ability to say "Package X on arch Y is failing due to bug #Z" would really help with scanning the logs. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
pgpQBW7XjtfM2.pgp
Description: PGP signature