Re: Bug#190038: libgtkdatabox_1:0.2.3.0-1(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on m68k
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, James Troup wrote:
> Which is just that the central src deps are out of date and happens on
> all architectures. It says "(probably)" for a reason; the central
> source deps are always guess work even when they're up-to-date.
Thanks for the clarification.
> > Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> > debhelper: missing
> > libgtk2.0-dev: missing
>
> Again this happens on all architectures.
You are right here, but building on other architectures works so far ...
> Like, duh, of course they're
> missing; builds are done in a clean chroot with nothing but
> build-essential installed. If you'd bother to read a little further,
> you'd see that libgtk2.0-dev does in fact get installed.
... but does not seem to work ...
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ was incorrectly installed
*** or that you have moved GTK+ since it was installed. In the latter case, you
*** may want to edit the pkg-config script: /usr/bin/pkg-config
This is the reason why I did not checked the whole install log of packages
because it smells like a missing libgtk2.0-dev.
> > So probably m68k architecture is broken
>
> Is this a trend or something?
I do not care about any trends or flamewars, sorry. I just found out that
this is the only architecture the package fails building and this is a call
for help solving the problem.
> Do you get 'cool points' for ignorantly
> slagging off m68k? *sigh*
No. I just ignore questions like these.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.
John F. Kennedy
Reply to: