Re: lightning quick woody+1 release scenarios (was Re: Wishlist for woody+1)
David Starner writes:
> At 09:46 PM 5/26/02 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >I wrote in response to Colin Watson:
> > > > > - release 2 months after woody
> > > >
> > > > Is anyone willing to maintain boot-floppies for another release? If not,
> > > > one of the best ways to achieve this is to get enough people working on
> > > > debian-installer to make it stable as quickly as possible.
> > >
> > > Yes, exactly. I'd love nothing more than to see woody+1 in 2 months, but
> > > the boot-floppies crew is emphatic that it's End Of Life, and probably
> > > wouldn't appreciate another release worth of work (it's always 500% more
> > > work than you'd expect to prepare boot-floppies for release) and no
> > > replacements are production quality yet.
> >
> >Here are a few scenarios that might be worth thinking about if we want
> >to seriously pursue a very quick successor to woody with limited updates.
>
> I'd like to see a GCC 3.1, with a working GNAT, on all architectures.
gnat-3.1 isn't yet supported on all architectures upstream (hurd, m68k
and arm are missing).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: